|
||||
|
The Crime
Behind the Criminal Wars! May 9, 2007 -- If your first guess is the attacks of September 11, 2001, on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, guess again.
It is a different crime, just as hideous by any legal standard and in any jurisdiction, but this crime, due to its very serious implications, is preferred by many to remain a secret.
It is a crime whose victims are not just the innocent civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq, but also every unsuspecting military personnel who put his or her life on the line in this synthetic war on terror, and you, the reader.
That evidence was not released until December 13, 2001, more than two months after the invasion of Afghanistan. On that date, the Pentagon released a tape of Bin Laden in which he confessed to his visitor, Khaled Al-Harbi, of prior knowledge of the 9/11 attacks.
A detailed analysis of the tape, the only authentication work on record, was summarized in an article published by counterpunch.org, “Osama’s Confession; Osama’s Reprieve”. The article confirms Ed Vulliamy and Jason Burke’s report, in The Observer, that the tape was the result of a sting operation and goes further to show that the sting was a two-part sting run by U.S. intelligence with the help of Saudi intelligence. The first part of the sting was to tape Bin Laden confessing; the second was to capture him. The Bush administration was the closest ever to Bin Laden and could have captured him on September 26, 2001, the date of the taping. On that date, intelligence operatives were feet from him, had 4 days advance notice of the date of the meeting, 24 hours advance notice of the exact location, and knew that Bin Laden would be there for at least 3 hours if not longer since his family and his favorite son Hamza lived in that village and Bin Laden was very likely to stay overnight.
There is no telling how the war on terror would have evolved with Bin Laden in custody, but, if captured on September 26, there would have been no justification and no international support for military operations against Afghanistan ten days later; the civilians who died in Afghanistan as a result are no longer unfortunate collateral damage as Rumsfeld would like us to believe, they were murdered.
On September 26, 2001, The Geneva Convention, The UN Charter, and Bush’s promise of “dead or alive” took a back seat to geopolitical gains in Central Asia. The counterpunch article
also shows that Bin Laden’s capture was deferred to a future unknown date with little or no advance notice and little
control over the capture operation parameters. On that date, a Special Forces helicopter crashed on a hill near the village. The Pentagon tells us that the helicopter was on a rescue mission to retrieve a wounded soldier and that it crashed in bad weather. A second helicopter on that mission rescued the crew while an F-14 destroyed the disabled helicopter shortly after. The Pentagon gave 1:30 pm ET as the time of the helicopter crash, 11:00 pm local.
The Bin Laden family home video tapes the Predator engine as part of the helicopter wreckage. Further viewing of the video revealed that among other wreckage footage, the camera housing of a Predator was taped and identified as part of the helicopter.
Such intermingling of wreckage parts can only indicate that the helicopter and the Predator collided in mid air and crashed.
Bad weather might have been the cause but freezing rain did not cause equipment failure; both the Predator and the helicopter are equipped with sophisticated deicing systems. The Bad weather and low ceiling might have caused the air space to shrink and caused the equipment to fly in close proximity. While the helicopter is equipped with a collision avoidance system, the Predator is not. Predator excluded,
a university math professor, a statistics specialist, had put the probability of Bin Laden being with his family in that village,
a village of 100 mud-huts in a country as large as Texas, at the same time as the helicopter at 5 in 1000 and much lower on
a night with freezing rain. When an intelligence operative was added to his calculations, the probably got closer to certainty
that Bin Laden was the target. One might think that sending those troops on such an operation and in such horrendous weather conditions is tantamount to sending them on a suicide mission. On its own merits it might not, but were those sent on the mission aware of the taping operation and the better opportunity to capture Bin Laden? Were those who were later sent to fight in Afghanistan aware?
By releasing the tape, a by-product of a sensitive intelligence operation, to justify an illegal policy of aggression to the detriment of America’s national security, the Bush administration committed high treason.
On December 13, 2001, the promise of “dead or alive” became the biggest lie that the American public and the world would live.
The majority of the information I shared with you has been shared with major mainstream media outlets, selected senators and congressman, judiciary committees in house and senate and law enforcement; no action has been taken yet. Unlike other crimes that the Bush administration is suspected of, the evidence used to expose this one is still in the public domain; all supplied by the Pentagon and government officials, nothing can be denied and nothing can be taken back.
Also, unlike the ruins
of The World Trade Center, possible evidence of another crime that were so conveniently and expeditiously hauled away,
this evidence is still intact and available to the media, governments, and law enforcement, to probe and independently analyze. Your donations sustain the Muckraker Report Archive. Please donate. Maher Osseiran was born in Beirut in 1956. He grew up
at a time when Lebanon was evolving - then devolving into its civil war. To learn more about Maher, visit his website www.mydemocracy.net. |
||||
|
|