Home | Contributing Writers | Writers Wanted | Index & Archives | Knights of the Muckraker Report | Congressman Ron Paul for President 2008 | Contacts & Mailing List | News Sources / References
muckrakerreport.com
Saddened by Savagery of Zionism

Saddened by Savagery of Zionism

 

August 9, 2006 – For the first time since the Six Day War (1967), Israel is prohibiting U.S. citizens of Palestinian descent from entering into the West Bank.  These Palestinian Americans, many of them professors, researchers, and business professionals, are being kept from their families, homes, jobs, and businesses.  How did the U.S. Embassy respond to this Israeli human rights violation?  The U.S. told an Israeli newspaper, Haaretz, “The United States cannot intervene in sovereign decisions of another country.”[1]  Imagine how much peace, prosperity, and security the people of the United States of America would enjoy if that really was the U.S. foreign policy – particularly in the Middle East.  Unfortunately for the American people, the U.S. Congress does not design its foreign policy towards the Middle East.  Instead, the U.S. Congress allows the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) to dictate U.S. foreign policy to the U.S. Congress, particularly its policy towards the Middle East.  See The Nation. AIPAC’s Hold.

 

According to The Nation writer, Ari Berman, on July 18, 2006 the Senate unanimously approved a non-binding resolution ‘condemning Hamas and Hezbollah and their state sponsors and supporting Israel’s exercise of its right to self-defense.’  After House majority leader John Boehner removed language from the bill urging ‘all sides to protect innocent civilian life and infrastructure,’ the House version passed by a landslide, 410-8.  The fact that Senate and House members voted in favor of a resolution that had such a fundamentally fair and sound concept - that both sides should protect innocent civilian life and infrastructure -removed from it, should sufficiently outrage Americans enough to remove those members from office as quickly as possible. 

 

And why did the AIPAC loyalist, House majority leader John Boehner, remove such simple, logical language from the House propaganda resolution?  According to the Berman piece, AIPAC not only lobbied for the resolution; it had written it.  “They [Congress] were given a resolution by AIPAC”, said former Carter Administration National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski. “They didn’t prepare one.”[2] 

 

Boehner can easily be defined as a key member of the neo con, pro-Zionist mafia, so whatever his reasons were for sending his kill the Lebanese and destroy Lebanon like there’s no tomorrow message to Israel, rest assured, the motives were selfish, corrupt, and immoral.  Ohio voters, particularly real Christian voters, need to once and for all rid themselves of John Boehner, Congressman for the 8th District of Ohio.

 

Something is inherently evil about any lobby, committee, syndicate, or cabal writing congressional resolutions, particularly when it is a pro-Zionism cartel that had two of its top officials indicted recently.   Steven J. Rosen and Keith Weissman, the former top AIPAC officials, are charged with conspiring to disclose national defense information to people not authorized to receive it, including their AIPAC colleagues, officials of the Israeli government, and a reporter for the Washington Post.[3]  Now why would AIPAC officials want U.S. national defense intelligence to pass onto their colleagues, the Israeli government, and the U.S. media? 

 

Not only should AIPAC be fully exposed, it must also be disarmed of its influential powers.  Only then will the United States be able to assume its appropriate role as an evenhanded broker in the Middle East.   But rather than expelling AIPAC and the Israel Lobby from its midst, the majority of the U.S. Congress remains in bed with the treasonous beast.  It is atrocious, and un-American, anti-Christian, anti-Muslim, anti-Arab…basically anti-everything except Ashkenazi Communistic Jew.  Can I get a witness? 

 

Putting the latest Israeli destruction and occupation of Lebanon in perspective

 

The single greatest missed or ignored point in the latest Israeli war of aggression against the Lebanese people is the location in which the two Israeli soldiers were captured.  Reports on July 12, 2006, the reported date in which this latest offensive began when it actually began on May 15, 1948, suggested that the Israeli soldiers were captured in southern Lebanon.  See Muckraker Report article, South Lebanon: Lost in Translation.  It is interesting to note that the Reuters article referenced in the Lost in Translation piece; the news service article that clearly stated, The Israeli army confirmed that two Israeli soldiers had been captured on the Lebanese frontier, is no longer available on the Internet.[4]  Where the Israeli soldiers were captured is a key piece of information to identify which side actually instigated this current battle, but for identifying who started the war, that’s a no brainer for anybody who has not been overtaken by the insane and blasphemous propaganda packaged under the unity banner titled Judeo-Christianity – a concept created by Zionists and meant to deceive the less than informed, sentimental Christian.   What a joke – Judeo Christian.  Why not just claim to be Hot / Cold, Black / White, or that you believe in No Messiah / Messiah, or No Savior / Savior?  Can I get a witness? 

 

Israel started the war in the Middle East decades ago by its displacement and murder of hundreds of thousands of non-Zionist people that stood in the way of the vile Zionist agenda.  It entrenched itself in Lebanon in 1967, and has never fully withdraw from Lebanon.  Hezbollah wants Israel out of all Lebanese territory to include Shebaa Farms, a Lebanese territory seized by the Zionists during its war of aggression in 1967, now referred to as the Six-Day War.  After U.N. Security Resolution 425 was passed in 1978 calling for the complete withdraw of Israeli troops from Lebanese territories, Israel took 23 years to partially comply with the international community’s mandate that it stop violating the property and territory of others.  Israel never withdrew from Shebaa Farms because the United States, through U.N. manipulations and negotiations, was able to remove the Shebaa Farms territory from the requirements of Security Resolution 425.  Please note that the majority of Lebanese people were not in agreement with Shebaa Farms being stolen by Zionist occupiers. But who the hell cares what the Lebanese people wanted, right?  Sounds familiar, does it not?  A special exemption for the Zionists at the expense of non-Zionists - Can I get a witness? 

 

If the initial reports of where the Israeli soldiers were captured are accurate, if they were captured on the Lebanese frontier, then Hezbollah was justified to capture them.  They had no business being in Lebanese territory – never did, never will.  But what if Hezbollah captured the Israeli soldiers on the border, or on the Israeli side of the border – which is how the Zionist-stamped kosher U.S. media is now describing the origin of the latest battle for Lebanese territory?  Would that make Hezbollah as culpable as Israel?  How could it with Israel occupying Shebaa Farms?  As long as a single Israeli soldier is permitted by the international community to occupy any Palestinian, Syrian, or Lebanese territory, the right of the occupied and oppressed people to defend themselves against the occupiers – by any and all means available to them, is as absolute as the right of any other to defend themselves. 

 

So what does Zionism want?  What it always wanted – to steal land, property, and wealth from other people.  It also wants to ensure that no neighboring nation ever emerges that has a formable military that could in fact hold Israeli aggression in check.  When frustrated by the few occasions that the international community has scorned its grotesque human rights violations, the Israelis build apartheid walls and create wasteland buffer zones in the name of self-defense.  If it had its way, there would be a fifty-mile buffer zone beyond its borders.  Maybe the international community needs to tell Israel that if it feels so vulnerable, then maybe it should create its buffer zone within its own borders instead of invading the territories of others.    If Israel wants a buffer zone – then it should create it on its side of the border. 

 

Think about it.  If you feel threatened by your neighbor’s dog, does that entitle you to build a fence twenty feet into your neighbor’s property?  What about if the neighbor’s dog bit you?  Now do you have the right to invade your neighbor’s property lines?  You might have the right to shoot the dog as it is attacking you on your property, or have the government seize the dog after the attack, but that does not translate into a right to build a buffer zone fence that encroaches twenty feet into your neighbor’s yard. 

 

What if your neighbor’s dog, unbeknownst to you, had five puppies before the government put the mother dog down? What if your neighbor harbored the puppies until they were grown?  What if one day, the dogs dug a hole underneath your illegal fence, crawled through, and mauled you?  Would you then have the right to blow up your neighbor’s house and the houses of all suspected friends of your neighbors?  How about all the roads and bridges leading into your neighborhood.  What about the animal hospital and the dogcatcher’s office at the police station?  Would you have the right to unleash this type of response?  Would the court of public opinion and the court of law accept this sort of response from you?  What if you got bit yet again, but this time you’re uncertain exactly what dog bit you because it was nighttime and you could not see well in the darkness?  Would that give you the right to begin killing all the dogs in your neighborhood? 

 

What if you jumped your illegal fence and got bit by the dog in your neighbor’s yard?  Would that give you the right to displace one-fifth of your town’s population?  What if many of the residents in your municipality decided that because of your insanely disproportional response to your neighbor’s dog attacking you, they had enough of your behavior, and were going to now side with your neighbor despite the fact that they don’t necessarily care much for him or her?  What if other people began to unleash their dogs onto you also?  Would that give you a right to start bombing your entire county?  Now do you have the right to move your fence to the perimeter of your sub-division?  Do you now have the right to violate human rights in the sub-division?  Can you imprison all residents of your sub-division that refuse to be occupied and oppressed by your savagery? 

 

And what if the original breeder of the first dog that attacked you, was you? 

 

Understand that what the Zionist state is doing in Lebanon today is so atrocious, so anti-God, that there will be a day of reckoning for each and all people that have turned a blind eye, or wildly supported this latest Zionist crime.  If your neighbor breeds pit pulls and trains them to be aggressive, attack, and fight, then the leash that contains the dogs is his or her responsibility.  But if the dogs break the leash and inflict wounds upon your family and friends, that doesn’t give you a right to exterminate all pit bulls, and dogs friendly with pit bulls, or people that harbor dogs in their houses and neighborhoods.  It doesn’t give you a right to go door to door in your neighborhood, gathering up all dogs, and imprison them for years under deplorable conditions.  

 

And what if you were the original breeder that is responsible for the aggressive, fighting, bloodletting breed of pit pull in the first place?  What if you were the one that abused and oppressed the breed to the point that its bloodline became savage?  What if it was your abuse and horror that made the dog strike back?  Well then, you might have wrought exactly what you deserved.  Life will have come full circle. 

 

When will life come full circle for the victims of Zionism?  How much longer must the world pay for the past sufferings of the self-chosen with the blood of those who do not claim to be Jews?  When will the United States break the shackles of Communist Zionism cleverly disguised as a democracy so that the U.S. can become a truly independent, fair, even-handed broker of peacefully achieved, peace in the Middle East? 

 

Maybe non-Zionists will stop paying the price for Zionism once pro-Zionists are taught that the people they continue to put down are not dogs. 

 

The pit bull analogy was for instructional purposes only.  Pit bulls are as friendly a breed of dog as any other -  if raised and nurtured properly. 



[1] Arab American Institute, Volume VII, No. 26, Second-Class Citizens?, July 11, 2006, http://www.aaiusa.org/countdown/2229/c071106, [Accessed August 6, 2006] 

[2] The Nation. AIPAC’s Hold, August 4, 2006, Ari Berman, http://www.thenation.com/doc/20060814/aipacs_hold, [Accessed August 4, 2006] 

[3] Washington Post, Dangerous Prosecution, April 20, 2006, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/19/AZ2006041902316.html, [Accessed August 6, 2006] 

[4] The Muckraker Report does have hard copy of the Reuters article, so if any reader would like to see it, let me know and I can scan it, fax it, e-mail it, etc. so that you can verify the content. 

 

 

If you enjoyed this article, please consider donating $1 or more to the MUCKRAKER REPORT.
Your donations keep the Muckraker Report subscription free!


Comments

Freelance writer / author, Ed Haas, is the editor and columnist for the Muckraker Report.  Get smart.  Read the Muckraker Report.  [http://teamliberty.net]  To learn more about Ed’s current and previous work, visit Crafting Prose.  [http://craftingprose.com]   

Join the MUCKRAKER REPORT mailing list to receive e-mail notification when new articles are posted. 

Join Our Mailing List
Email:

Your donations keep the Muckraker Report subscription free!


Copyright 2002-2007 by MUCKRAKER REPORT.
All rights reserved.
For re-print permission, contact Ed Haas: (843) 817-9962.